Five criteria for evaluating Web pages

Evaluation of Web documents

How to interpret the basics

1.  Accuracy of Web Documents

·         Who wrote the page and can you contact him or her?

·         What is the purpose of the document and why was it produced?

·         Is this person qualified to write this document?

Accuracy

·         Make sure author provides e-mail or a contact address/phone number.

·         Know the distinction between author and Webmaster.

2. Authority of Web Documents

·         Who published the document and is it separate from the "Webmaster?"

·         Check the domain of the document, what institution publishes this document?

·         Does the publisher list his or her qualifications?

Authority

·         What credentials are listed for the authors)?

·         Where is the document published? Check URL domain.

3. Objectivity of Web Documents

·         What goals/objectives does this page meet?

·         How detailed is the information?

·         What opinions (if any) are expressed by the author?

Objectivity

·         Determine if page is a mask for advertising; if so information might be biased.

·         View any Web page as you would an infommercial on television. Ask yourself why was this written and for whom?

4. Currency of Web Documents

·         When was it produced?

·         When was it updated'

·         How up-to-date are the links (if any)?

Currency

·         How many dead links are on the page?

·         Are the links current or updated regularly?

·         Is the information on the page outdated?

5. Coverage of the Web Documents

·         Are the links (if any) evaluated and do they complement the documents' theme?

·         Is it all images or a balance of text and images?

·         Is the information presented cited correctly?

Coverage

·         If page requires special software to view the information, how much are you missing if you don't have the software?

·         Is it free or is there a fee, to obtain the information?

·         Is there an option for text only, or frames, or a suggested browser for better viewing?

Putting it all together

Accuracy. If your page lists the author and institution that published the page and provides a way of contacting him/her and . . .

Authority. If your page lists the author credentials and its domain is preferred (.edu, .gov, .org, or .net), and, . .

Objectivity. If your page provides accurate information with limited advertising and it is objective in presenting the information, and . . .

Currency. If your page is current and updated regularly (as stated on the page) and the links (if any) are also up-to-date, and . . .

Coverage. If you can view the information properly--not limited to fees, browser technology, or software requirement, then . . .

You may have a Web page that could be of value to your research!

Source: Kapoun, Jim. "Teaching undergrads WEB evaluation: A guide for library instruction." C&RL News (July/August 1998): 522-523.

Reprinted with permission of the author.